“It’s a basic misunderstanding of feminism as pious, sexlessness. “I think it’s a shame that she has been reduced to one inferred moment in the film,” Wilde told Variety‘s Marc Malkin on the 2019 Gotham Awards red carpet. It’s also worth noting that Wilde’s comments on this ( to Variety earlier this month) have already received a whole lot of backlash: That may be enough to get them out of a defamation suit if one is ever filed, but the claim here from the movie is still a huge leap from known facts, and it’s notable that it’s produced this pushback. Dialogue and certain events and characters contained in the film were created for the purposes of dramatization.” Of course, this may not lead to legal success for the AJC Deadline’s Dominic Patten writes that the film already includes the disclaimer of “The film is based on actual historical events. The movie’s claim that Scruggs slept with a source is a very serious allegation that’s unproven, and it seems particularly unfair to levy that claim against a reporter who passed away almost two decades ago and can’t take on that allegation herself. That’s a bad statement on a lot of levels, including not specifically addressing what’s at hand here. just absolutely steaming that someone would suggest the studio (checks notes) issues a disclaimer saying the movie they’re releasing - which falsely accuses a dead female reporter of trading sex for info - takes liberties with the facts /FtdRSXQOYZ “It’s ironic that the film commits the same sins that it accuses the media of committing.”įor their part, Warner Bros. “The film literally makes things up and adds to misunderstandings about how serious news organizations work,” said Riley. Jewell, a security guard at the park, helped to evacuate the area after the bomb was discovered. Eric Rudolph, an American terrorist, was later found to have been responsible for setting off a bomb that killed two people and injured 111 others. In it, he also asserts that not only does the film fail to accurately characterize Scruggs’ behavior, it also misrepresents the role that the paper’s reporting played in exonerating Jewell. … Singer sent the letter on behalf of the paper and its owner Cox Enterprises. “We have been clear about how disturbed we are in the film’s use of a Hollywood trope about reporters…and how it misrepresents how seriously journalists concern themselves with reporting accurately and ethically.” “I think this letter makes it clear how seriously we take the misrepresentation of our reporters’ actions and of the actions of the newspaper during that time,” he said. He said he felt that the movie trades in harmful stereotypes about female journalists, such as those seen in movies like “Absence of Malice” and “Thank You for Smoking” that have depicted female reporters sleeping with sources. Riley saw the film when it premiered at AFI Fest. Riley, editor of the Journal-Constitution, said that reporters in his newsroom and those who knew Scruggs were disturbed by the film’s portrayal. “We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.” “We hereby demand that you immediately issue a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters,” the letter, sent to Warner Bros., Eastwood, and screenwriter Billy Ray, reads. threatening a defamation case and demanding a statement acknowledging dramatic license here and asking for a disclaimer to be added to the film: But the AJC has maintained there’s no evidence that Scruggs slept with anyone involved in the Jewell investigation, and as per Brent Lang of Variety, that has now led to the paper hiring an attorney to send a letter to Eastwood, screenwriter Billy Ray, and production company Warner Bros. In the film, she’s portrayed as getting that information by sleeping with an FBI source (played by Jon Hamm). Scruggs (who passed away in 2001) broke the story that Jewell was under investigation by the FBI.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |